I've been watching this post to see how it plays out.
Initially I too rolled my eyes. The message is there, but the giant image of a floating muskie tends to shadow the actual intent of the post.
Is there concern for all species in these circumstances? Of course there is. Is the content of the post accurate and informative? I believe so. Was the presentation clear in it's intent... in my opinion...... No. (nor is this the first time... but that's neither here nor there). The message was skewed by the giant image of a floating muskie. Was there a need for the image? Again, my opinion..... No.
The same message could have been presented with simple text. The image could be construed as an implication that the recent die-off of muskie is directly related to non-water release. It could also be perceived that only muskie will suffer from a non-water release. It could even be taken as a direct implication that all fishing should be ceased immediately.
This is an excellent example of how each person perceives information in a different way. Bearing that in mind, try to remember the variance of audience on Fish-Hawk.net and try to post accordingly.
For example:
Just a quick reminder for some, and possibly helpful info for others...
With the warm weather we've been experiencing, warm surface temperatures combined with time out water can cause a detrimental amount of stress on a number of fish species. So, if at all possible, try a water release.
Good luck to all - and don't forget your sunscreen!!
Good information, not directed, a heart-felt request, and a little light humour.
Just my 2 cents.
ML