Lead Free Fishing - Voice your concern
Lead Free Fishing - Voice your concern
I try not to cross post from other fishing boards; BUT, this item must be passed thru the fishing community.
The potential for the ban of lead for fishing tackle has reappeared.
The CWS (Candian Wildlife Service) has begun its process.
The following from Ontario Fishing Net:
http://www.ontariofishing.net/cgi/messa ... 1335.shtml
Its potential is far-ranging.
F Y I
The potential for the ban of lead for fishing tackle has reappeared.
The CWS (Candian Wildlife Service) has begun its process.
The following from Ontario Fishing Net:
http://www.ontariofishing.net/cgi/messa ... 1335.shtml
Its potential is far-ranging.
F Y I
David Delcloo aka Superdad
(Retired)
Hay Bay / Kingston
Manufacturer of the UZICK Spinner
(Retired)
Hay Bay / Kingston
Manufacturer of the UZICK Spinner
- SkeeterJohn
- Diamond Participant
- Posts: 2867
- Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 7:32 am
- Location: Ottawa
Don't ignore this issue and make sure you have your say!Send comments to:
Lead Free Fishing Consultations
3rd floor
351 St. Joseph Blvd.
Gatineau, Quebec
K1A 0H3
Or by e-mail to: LeadFreeFishingConsultations@ec.gc.ca
- BASSSTALKER
- Gold Participant
- Posts: 1425
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2003 7:33 pm
- Location: OTTAWA
- Contact:
Tungston(spelling) is the replacement for lead in most cases, but tin is also used. Tungston is much more dense and thus is smaller than it's lead comparison by almost half. Because it is more dense it makes more noise when it comes into contact with rock or wood. Great for triggering strikes. Because of it's smaller size for the same weight, it is easier to get through the thicker slop. It is not toxic at all, but does cost about 1/2 more than lead. I use it alot and it works great. It is available in jigs, worm weights, snap on weights and bell sinkers.
The down side of it is the cost and it is so hard it can be brittle, but I haven't had any problems yet.
Hope this helps
JP
The down side of it is the cost and it is so hard it can be brittle, but I haven't had any problems yet.
Hope this helps
JP
Smile, It's a good day on the water!!
- Scum Frog
- Silver Participant
- Posts: 854
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 1:34 pm
- Location: Carleton Place
- Contact:
Here is the problem with the hole basis of going lead free. As the gov't has no way of truely knowing how much lead is deposited into our waterways via fishing tackle, they went with numbers they have. The gov't is basing the amount of lead lost in waterways on the amount of lead fishing tackle sold each year, including downrigger balls ( ever see a loon try to swallow a 8lb ball
). We all know anglers only buy things to replace what has been lost 


You know, I am usually up on the hot topics but I was unaware of this. Thanks for the info, as I am all for the care of our environment, something just doesnt seem right. I mean I will pay the extra money for the replacement if needed but I would like to see somemore true facts on this study not just assumptions. I just have a hard time believing that lead sinkers are the main cause for loon deaths.
- Caseys Dream
- Bronze Participant
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 9:13 pm
- Location: London
I posted a bit of background info on this lead issue a few weeks ago, check it out. There is more science to this than you'd think, and downrigger cannonballs do make a difference. They gradually dissolve and contribute to the total lead loading of waterways, leading to lead still being found in fatty tissue of larger predator fish.
This is not just a dying loon problem, it is just that dead loons make people get excited and make a nice headline, the real problem is point-source lead contributions to our waterways, and fishing equipment has been targetted as a large one easily removed.
CD
This is not just a dying loon problem, it is just that dead loons make people get excited and make a nice headline, the real problem is point-source lead contributions to our waterways, and fishing equipment has been targetted as a large one easily removed.
CD
The latest issue of Outdoor Canada, 2005 Fishing Special Issue, has an article about this very topic. It will not answer everyones questions, and will more than likely cause more controversy. The bottom line seems to be it is an easy and immediate solution to a "problem?". Bismuth is likely to become the substitute metal. All National Parks are already lead free I believe, so be careful when fishing there.
- muskymuskymusky
- Bronze Participant
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 11:03 am
Ok i am confused.
ok i am confused as to why it is a big deal. Could someone who is against the lead ban please explain why it is a big issue if the next time you go to a fishing store and you have to buy Bismuth (which ive never heard of)instead of lead. Whats the big problem with banning a poison.(i use lead so im not saying anything about people who do) I am just looking for the negative to banning lead. Is it cost of replacement ? (grandfather clause will take care of that i am sure) Is it that this mental is bigger to get same weight? Is it that the medel is not plyable enough to be use well? Help me understand please
Thanks

Thanks
- fishforfun
- Gold Participant
- Posts: 1408
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 2:45 pm
- Location: Georgetown Ont.