definition of immediate release.
Hi Guys
On what grounds does he have to ask for the camera....NONE! Why would you voluntarily incriminate yourself?
Similarly a lawyer would say the same goes for drinking and driving.
If you are pulled over never admit to have been drinking. Why would you admit to something that would provide the police probable cause?
Steve
On what grounds does he have to ask for the camera....NONE! Why would you voluntarily incriminate yourself?
Similarly a lawyer would say the same goes for drinking and driving.
If you are pulled over never admit to have been drinking. Why would you admit to something that would provide the police probable cause?
Steve
Steve, they grounds they have are different than being pulled over by the OPP. copied this from the Ontario regs page 7. Apparently they can not only ask to look at the camera, they can seize it. Am I happy they can seize my camera, nope, but can they hell yeah.steve2112 wrote:Hi Guys
On what grounds does he have to ask for the camera....NONE! Why would you voluntarily incriminate yourself?
Similarly a lawyer would say the same goes for drinking and driving.
If you are pulled over never admit to have been drinking. Why would you admit to something that would provide the police probable cause?
Steve
Conservation Officers – Conservation Officers enforce fisheries regulations in the Province of Ontario. They have powers of inspection, arrest, search and seizure under the various statutes they enforce, including the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act and the Fisheries Act. When carrying out their duties, Conservation Officers may do the following:
• Stop and inspect a vehicle, boat or aircraft
• Ask questions relevant to the inspection
• Inspect buildings or other places
• Require assistance to complete inspections
• Enter onto private property to perform their duties
• Search with a warrant
• Search without a warrant in circumstances requiring immediate action
• Seize items related to an offence
• Arrest anyone the Conservation Officer believes has committed, is committing, or is about to commit an offence.
- Bass Addict
- Diamond Participant
- Posts: 4536
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 4:47 pm
- Location: I'm keeping an EYE on Fish-Hawk
- troutnmuskiehunter
- Diamond Participant
- Posts: 3131
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:30 am
Where did you do your research to make such a statement BA???Bass Addict wrote:I repeat ..
Has there ever been a case where someone has been '' CHARGED '' with taking a pic of an OOS fish............NOT !!!!!!
Do you have evidence to back this up?....did you send an e-mail to the Quebec MNR and Ontario MNR......????
- Bass Addict
- Diamond Participant
- Posts: 4536
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 4:47 pm
- Location: I'm keeping an EYE on Fish-Hawk
Nah ..TroutnMuskieHunter wrote:Where did you do your research to make such a statement BA???Bass Addict wrote:I repeat ..
Has there ever been a case where someone has been '' CHARGED '' with taking a pic of an OOS fish............NOT !!!!!!
Do you have evidence to back this up?....did you send an e-mail to the Quebec MNR and Ontario MNR......????
None of the above ..
just common sense.....
- troutnmuskiehunter
- Diamond Participant
- Posts: 3131
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:30 am
LOL...Bass Addict wrote:Nah ..TroutnMuskieHunter wrote:Where did you do your research to make such a statement BA???Bass Addict wrote:I repeat ..
Has there ever been a case where someone has been '' CHARGED '' with taking a pic of an OOS fish............NOT !!!!!!
Do you have evidence to back this up?....did you send an e-mail to the Quebec MNR and Ontario MNR......????
None of the above ..
just common sense.....


I did call the quebec mnr wen we did talk about this the last time..and talk to the guy live on the phone and its clear.
at least for the quebec mnr....it meen as soon as posible no pict taken is allowed...
do they charge people.....dont no.,,but they can
but gain they will never say yes it legal because it guive them at least some kind off force in case there some abuse then they will ticket the person.
and i totaly approve that do so. if the people take there time to take pict.
if you are the kind off people that dont care about the life off the fish more then your freaking ego..so get a ticket.....i would anyway.
.
joco.....the subject is going around and around now.
at least for the quebec mnr....it meen as soon as posible no pict taken is allowed...
do they charge people.....dont no.,,but they can
but gain they will never say yes it legal because it guive them at least some kind off force in case there some abuse then they will ticket the person.
and i totaly approve that do so. if the people take there time to take pict.
if you are the kind off people that dont care about the life off the fish more then your freaking ego..so get a ticket.....i would anyway.

joco.....the subject is going around and around now.
- Bass Addict
- Diamond Participant
- Posts: 4536
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 4:47 pm
- Location: I'm keeping an EYE on Fish-Hawk
- Fishing 24/7
- Diamond Participant
- Posts: 3243
- Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2007 11:47 am
- Location: In Your Lake
www.birdbrain.com aka bass-addict aka bird-addict aka paul
- Fishing 24/7
- Diamond Participant
- Posts: 3243
- Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2007 11:47 am
- Location: In Your Lake
OOS rules them all. as long as your not fishing for them!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkErjGOihoM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkErjGOihoM
I think it is perfectly fine to take 1 pic and then put er' back, which I am sure many of us have done..........of course, if you kept that fish that fish, that is a whole other story. We only do it REALLY quick with the bigger ones, and do not rave about it like the ISF.
.....but I am just a kid, so that is up to you guys.........
Glad to here someone is talking about releasing a fish!!
TT
TY
p.s.
Nice healthy laker 24/7!

.....but I am just a kid, so that is up to you guys.........
Glad to here someone is talking about releasing a fish!!


TT
TY
p.s.
Nice healthy laker 24/7!

Formerly known as "The Torpedo"