Proposed New FishHawk.net signu procedure

This is where it's all going on. One can ask for advice or general information or simply chew the fat about fishing tackle, tips, and locations.
User avatar
Mick
Silver Participant
Silver Participant
Posts: 562
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 1:32 pm
Location: Orleans

Proposed New FishHawk.net signu procedure

Post by Mick »

So, we had alot of activity following up the picture of that Muskie from Petrie Island last weekend. A guy gets his first muskie ever, posts a pic, his third ever post on Hawk Talk, and get annihilated for it.

It is funny that folks talk about what a great bunch is on this board, how friendly it is, helpful etc and then you see stuff like this.

With that in my mind, I spent a fews days thinking about a new member sign up procedure and all in all some new operational procedures for new Hawk Talk members.

Here they are:

Step 1: Download fishing regulations from the MNR (link conveniently located on Fish Hawk)
Step 2: Study, study, study
Step 3: Take on line Fish Hawk Member Sign Up test, 100 questions, true or false, minimum 95% to pass cause we surely wouldn't want people breaking the law more than 5% of the time.

(Of course we would have the three strikes and your out rule. Cause if you cannot pass this test, we sure don't need you round here. )

Step 4: Once the candidate has passed the MNR Regs test, the candidate will be directed to spend a few weeks familiarizing himself with the past 50 or so pages on Hawk Talk. The intent of this familiarization period is to ensure that the idiot newbie doesn't post a question or start a debate that has been previously beat to death forcing some long time Hawk Talker to annihilate him/her for asking a question about a previously visited issue.

Step 5: Once the candidate feels appropriately versed in Hawk Talk history, a panel of experienced Hawk Talkers will grill the candidate in a live chat session on Hawk Talk history. Again, a 95% pass mark will be established because we wouldn't want the newbie to open recently healed wounds.

Step 6: Assuming we have a candidate that successfully passes step 1 thru 5, then we will know that we are truly dealing with a potential new member. At this point, the candidate will be required to spend a few months angling and submitting his/her pics to the aforementioned panel of experienced Hawk Talkers. The panel will assess the hold techniques and recommend appropriate procedures for proper fish handling. Once the candidate pic holds get up to snuff, the candidate will then move on to the final phase of the sign up procedure.

Step 7: The candidate will need to correctly identify bass spawning beds from looking at topographic map from bodies of water with which he/she is not familiar. This is a very critical step, because regardless of the fact that there are many species of fish in season in June, we cannot interrupt the bass spawn or be seen fishing within 100 yards of a location that could potentially host a bass spawn.

Assuming that the candidate passes step 7, he will become a certified member of Fish Hawk which of course comes complete with a laminated copy of the fishing regs.

No longer will a friendly Hawk Talker be recognized thru the attractive headwear, but instead, one fellow will sidle up to the other and say "psst, hey buddy, whats on the 2nd paragraph of the 24th page in the 2005 regs" And of course, those that cannot respond properly will be known for the impostors that they are!

Get a god damn life people. The guy had never caught a muskie before in his life and is ecstatic about it. He posts pics and gets annihilated for it.

Oh, I almost forgot the most important part. The swear in ceremony where the newbie Hawk Talker swears to become a hypocrite. This is especially important in those instances where an obviously very knowledgeable angler post a slew of pics of giant pike and no one, absolutely no one, has the balls to say jack about the vertical holds

Mick
User avatar
Markus
Diamond Participant
Diamond Participant
Posts: 7362
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 8:05 am
Location: Nova Scotia/St Catharines

Post by Markus »

That about sums it up Mick. :wink:

Thanks buddy.
User avatar
Canadian Bacon
Diamond Participant
Diamond Participant
Posts: 4396
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 7:56 am

Post by Canadian Bacon »

Good post..thanks Mick
User avatar
fishforfun
Gold Participant
Gold Participant
Posts: 1408
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: Georgetown Ont.

Post by fishforfun »

Sad but true!
User avatar
Wall-I-Guy
Diamond Participant
Diamond Participant
Posts: 4930
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2003 2:06 am
Location: Kanata,Ontario

Post by Wall-I-Guy »

In fact, it's too true :!:

Well said :!:

But some of us were trying to let it die :!: :wink:
User avatar
Mike the 'Tender
Bronze Participant
Bronze Participant
Posts: 452
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 1:25 pm
Location: Toronto

Post by Mike the 'Tender »

The one thing I can say about studying the past 50 pages or so of fish hawk is simply use the search that's at the top of the page. It works well and put to use, would solve one of the problems you mentioned Mick.
User avatar
MichaelVandenberg
Silver Participant
Silver Participant
Posts: 736
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2003 9:44 am
Location: Ontario

Post by MichaelVandenberg »

When can we put this in effect?

Entertaining post. Some of it hits to close to home.
User avatar
TroutSlayer
Bronze Participant
Bronze Participant
Posts: 408
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 6:11 pm
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Contact:

Re: Proposed New FishHawk.net signu procedure

Post by TroutSlayer »

Mick wrote:So, we had alot of activity following up the picture of that Muskie from Petrie Island last weekend. A guy gets his first muskie ever, posts a pic, his third ever post on Hawk Talk, and get annihilated for it.
Mick, I enjoyed reading your post! I know how the guy must have felt. I got jumped on last year here for posting my young friends first ever Brook Trout (an eight pounder), which he kept. He was holding it wrong according to experts here, and I was forced to quickly remove the photo, hoping he didn't read the terrible thread that followed. I have been leary about posting photos since.
Cheers,
TS
User avatar
Canadian Bacon
Diamond Participant
Diamond Participant
Posts: 4396
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 7:56 am

Post by Canadian Bacon »

Troutslayer...
Post your picks...anytime and don't let those people bother you, most of them just have nothing better to do or nice to say! It's great to educate but not to critisize or be harsh...some do it properly and nicely...disregard the others.
Last edited by Canadian Bacon on Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Jale
Silver Participant
Silver Participant
Posts: 717
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 7:50 pm
Location: Charleston

Post by Jale »

Troutslayer..

I would personally LOVE to see a pic of an 8 pound speckle...bring it on!!

Joe
User avatar
Scumking
Silver Participant
Silver Participant
Posts: 631
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:27 am
Location: St Bruno,QC

Post by Scumking »

Thanks Bacon,


I have some Walleye Pics from last fall at Quinte that I wanted to post.I later found out that bigger fish should not be held by the head.After 25 yrs fishing I had no idea this was a no no and will cease doing this. When I got to Nightttrollers last Friday night I showed him the Pics and he mentioned the head holding .

Based on the recent Lamb bastings I'm holding these back.All fish took off when released but I don't want to be another Muskie at Petrie.



Ron
User avatar
Canadian Bacon
Diamond Participant
Diamond Participant
Posts: 4396
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 7:56 am

Post by Canadian Bacon »

I hear ya, I know Rich and I am sure he was extremely nice about it...and just said you should really hold it this way...or something like that.
That is all that is necessary...you learned and felt good about it!!

I can show you lots of pics I have with Big Walleye being held vertically...I have posted some and nothing said...
User avatar
TroutSlayer
Bronze Participant
Bronze Participant
Posts: 408
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 6:11 pm
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Contact:

Post by TroutSlayer »

jale6666 wrote:Troutslayer..

I would personally LOVE to see a pic of an 8 pound speckle...bring it on!!

Joe
Thanks Joe and Canadian Bacon, I'll post it here for you for a short time, but I won't put it back in the thread it was removed from.

Image

This kid was on his first Speck trip in Haliburton and this was his first ever Speck! That's really something to be proud of!
Cheers,
TS
User avatar
fishforfun
Gold Participant
Gold Participant
Posts: 1408
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: Georgetown Ont.

Post by fishforfun »

scumking and Bacon couldn't agree more, had never been told or shown proper fish handling till I joined fishhawk :oops: that's what makes the internet so valuable, you can learn a lot in the right places, and I fished for 40 yrs before I got here!
User avatar
Canadian Bacon
Diamond Participant
Diamond Participant
Posts: 4396
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 7:56 am

Post by Canadian Bacon »

WoW what a COW...must have been very excited about that!!
Post Reply