Side Imaging or Down Imaging

This is where it's all going on. One can ask for advice or general information or simply chew the fat about fishing tackle, tips, and locations.
User avatar
MLR
Silver Participant
Silver Participant
Posts: 857
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 6:31 pm
Location: Mink Lake

Side Imaging or Down Imaging

Post by MLR »

Who has what, and which do you use most?

I am thinking about buying a new unit and looking for feed back on down imaging or side imaging. (I don't plan on dropping big $$$ for both)
User avatar
beachburger
Gold Participant
Gold Participant
Posts: 1068
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 8:48 pm
Location: Beachburg

Post by beachburger »

I have a H'Bird on the console and use the side imaging way more than the down imaging. If I had a second one on the bow, I'm sure I'd get more mileage out of the down imaging.

I believe the H'Bird units with SI also have DI so it's not necessarily one or the other but i stand to be corrected. Not sure about the Lowrance units.

HTH,
Doug
User avatar
Matt_Stothers
Participant
Participant
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 10:23 am
Location: Deep River

Post by Matt_Stothers »

Both is the answer. Doug is right, the newer Humminbird units have both side imaging and down imaging. The side imaging is an excellent tool to find structure and contours off the sides of your boat and then it can broken down and better examined with the down imaging.

Just remember that the further out the SI is shooting the worse the resolution, so when you find an area of interest you need to adjust the distance out from the boat that the beam is shooting. The closer to the boat, the better the resolution.

Obviously depending on depth you may want to scan a wider area or if you're hugging the shore you may want a wider scan on one side etc. but this should get you started.
User avatar
bl8ant
Silver Participant
Silver Participant
Posts: 521
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 10:57 am
Location: Ottawa

Post by bl8ant »

I use my side imaging most when looking for/at structure and regular down firing sonar to look for fish.
User avatar
steve-hamilton
Gold Participant
Gold Participant
Posts: 1688
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 8:32 am

Post by steve-hamilton »

when is "front imaging" coming out?

i mean, as a troller, i dont care what is beside me....and down imaging is just a fancy way of telling what is below the boat....

front imaging would be the best.

see what is up ahead, then change accordingly.
User avatar
MLR
Silver Participant
Silver Participant
Posts: 857
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 6:31 pm
Location: Mink Lake

Post by MLR »

steve-hamilton wrote:when is "front imaging" coming out?

i mean, as a troller, i dont care what is beside me....and down imaging is just a fancy way of telling what is below the boat....

front imaging would be the best.

see what is up ahead, then change accordingly.
could you turn the transducer 90 degrees ?
User avatar
Hookup
Silver Participant
Silver Participant
Posts: 795
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 8:54 am
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (eh)

Post by Hookup »

SI is more often used than DI in my boat.

If you have to make a choice, go with a unit that just does SI.


For many reasons I believe Lorwance is better than HB.

I own two HB units (the 788ci and the 798ci SI). I like the HB, but the Lowrance did networking correctly and does data import/export correctly (well as far as DR. Depth is concerned). Those feature are more "cool cause you can play around", which I like to do...

Both units seem to do an equally good job, not having owned a lowrance I cannot speak for sure... but from what I've seen in ppls boats it looks good.

The HB works nice for sure... the 798ci with side & down imaging is pretty cool and you will not be disappointed.

I believe that the entry price for both is similar with HB being a bit cheaper, and you get DI included, whereas Lowrance is a bit more expensive and you would have to buy the Down-Scan hardware to get that function.
User avatar
beachburger
Gold Participant
Gold Participant
Posts: 1068
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 8:48 pm
Location: Beachburg

Post by beachburger »

i mean, as a troller, i dont care what is beside me
I am anything but a troller but if your lines were way back there wouldn't side imaging be useful to let you know of structure so that you could change course immediately to get the lines nearer or over the structure?
User avatar
steve-hamilton
Gold Participant
Gold Participant
Posts: 1688
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 8:32 am

Post by steve-hamilton »

i dont do much "contour" trolling....

it's a situation of finding bait....

and yes, i guess, if you found bait off to the side, you could try and send your inlines out further, or in tighter....

but in general, most will mark the "side bait" (or fish) on their finder, and move back through it....

it would make so much more sense to me to see a front image, then react accordingly.

I'm sure it'll come out, as the next "big thing" soon enough.

For a smallie guy, offshore structure is great on the SI. But for the troller, not so great.
User avatar
beachburger
Gold Participant
Gold Participant
Posts: 1068
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 8:48 pm
Location: Beachburg

Post by beachburger »

I'm sure it'll come out, as the next "big thing" soon enough.
No doubt. The Visa will be ready.....
User avatar
C5
Bronze Participant
Bronze Participant
Posts: 185
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:10 am
Location: Delta ON

electronics seminar

Post by C5 »

I was hoping that one or several of the local experts would put on a seminar this winter to look at the whole spectrum of new technologies.

I need to update both units on the boat this year as the X 1-5 is a bit long in the tooth:)

A expert review on dide and down imaging and networking would be awesome!
User avatar
C5
Bronze Participant
Bronze Participant
Posts: 185
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:10 am
Location: Delta ON

electronics seminar

Post by C5 »

I was hoping that one or several of the local experts would put on a seminar this winter to look at the whole spectrum of new technologies.

I need to update both units on the boat this year as the X 15 is a bit long in the tooth:)

A expert review on side and down imaging and networking would be awesome!
User avatar
toobinator
Gold Participant
Gold Participant
Posts: 1354
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2002 10:50 pm
Location: Winchester Ont.
Contact:

Post by toobinator »

I have some great pricing on the Humminbird 798 and 1197,(5"and 11" screens resectively), both with side imaging and down look. I also have some of these units on display so that they can be fired up and you can play with them. Numbersof these units are restricted to what I have in stock. I am also expecting a load of Humminbird 788's in soon too at clearout pricing.

Ed
Save a bass. Eat a chicken
User avatar
eye-tracker
Gold Participant
Gold Participant
Posts: 1998
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 9:23 am
Location: Perth, Ontario
Contact:

Post by eye-tracker »

Forward scanning sonar has been on the market for many years, mind you it is not really used in recreational fishing market due to the high cost and complexity of the transducer installation.
I have been in a few large cruisers and commercial vessels that run forward scanning sonar. It is very similar to reading a radar unit.
Image

-s
Sheldon Hatch
Just a guy that likes to fish walleye
User avatar
steve-hamilton
Gold Participant
Gold Participant
Posts: 1688
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 8:32 am

Post by steve-hamilton »

high cost and complexity...

in other words, the next big thing.

give it two more years.
Post Reply