Banning of frogs and crayfish as bait in Ontario
- Scum Frog
- Silver Participant
- Posts: 854
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 1:34 pm
- Location: Carleton Place
- Contact:
Banning of frogs and crayfish as bait in Ontario
The MNR has an ERB to possibly ban the use of frogs and crayfish as bait in Ontario.
http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/envregistry/027239ep.htm
Any opinions?
http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/envregistry/027239ep.htm
Any opinions?
Last edited by Scum Frog on Fri Mar 24, 2006 7:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I just hope they dont BAN.........the scum frog......species to fish wit,,,
I WOULD LIKE TO SAY....I AM AGAINST IT,,,,,,,,,THAT LAW...
I DONT USE THEM MYSELF TO FISH,,BUT ITS GREAT WAY TO FISH...AND IF THIS START IT WONT STOP THERE,,,,MINNOWS,,,LEECH,,,,ETC,,,NOT GREAT FOR A LOCAL BAITSHOP,,,AND FOR ARE LIMIT,,,, ...
I WOULD LIKE TO SAY....I AM AGAINST IT,,,,,,,,,THAT LAW...
I DONT USE THEM MYSELF TO FISH,,BUT ITS GREAT WAY TO FISH...AND IF THIS START IT WONT STOP THERE,,,,MINNOWS,,,LEECH,,,,ETC,,,NOT GREAT FOR A LOCAL BAITSHOP,,,AND FOR ARE LIMIT,,,, ...
Last edited by joco on Fri Mar 24, 2006 1:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
My own personal opinion leans towards the total ban of live frogs and crayfish for bait. The irresponsible dumping of live unused bait into the water system is most likely the biggest reason invasive species end up in some of our lakes and rivers. The decline in frogs has been most noticeable to me, as a shore fisherman I have observed the decline, and in some places, the total absence of frogs last year. So I would be in favour of a total ban on the use and harvesting of live frogs and crayfish for bait. (And yes, I did read the MNR bulletin on this subject)
-
- Diamond Participant
- Posts: 3306
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 3:29 am
- Location: A Superfishery Near You.
Daily limit on frogs is 6. What are they really banning anyways.
My favorite valley largemouth hole had tonnes of leopards at the launch last year. The year before they seemed absent from that spot but, I fished another area close by and had no problem catching a few. Then there was a rainy night drive mass Frogger suicide I remember.
Still good numbers, years may vary, but last two seasons the amphibians came later than usual.
Crayfish.... no clue.
My favorite valley largemouth hole had tonnes of leopards at the launch last year. The year before they seemed absent from that spot but, I fished another area close by and had no problem catching a few. Then there was a rainy night drive mass Frogger suicide I remember.
Still good numbers, years may vary, but last two seasons the amphibians came later than usual.
Crayfish.... no clue.
- Fishing Freak
- Silver Participant
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 8:56 am
- Location: Brockville
This is a crock.
Banning frogs and crayfish is a start. Next is minnows and worms.
I use them every now and again, and there is no shortage of frogs in this area.
As for dumping frogs and crayfish into the lakes, around here anyway, they are already full of them.
I'm against this, as it is just a start to the total banning of all live bait.
Banning frogs and crayfish is a start. Next is minnows and worms.
I use them every now and again, and there is no shortage of frogs in this area.
As for dumping frogs and crayfish into the lakes, around here anyway, they are already full of them.
I'm against this, as it is just a start to the total banning of all live bait.
- slushpuppy
- Retail Advertiser
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:58 pm
- Location: Stittsville (Ottawa)
- Contact:
Daily limit on frogs is 12 (not 6), and this limit is the number of frogs that an angler may catch for his personal use. That does not include the limit on how many he/she can purchase from a licensed vendor.
We could have sold many frogs this past summer, as many people came in to the shop looking for just that. We don't sell them (or crayfish). They're hard to keep contained and are apparently pretty smelly.
In Quebec where live bait is banned, people still use minnows, but they kill them first. So simply banning live bait won't protect the bait species.
We could have sold many frogs this past summer, as many people came in to the shop looking for just that. We don't sell them (or crayfish). They're hard to keep contained and are apparently pretty smelly.
In Quebec where live bait is banned, people still use minnows, but they kill them first. So simply banning live bait won't protect the bait species.
- slushpuppy
- Retail Advertiser
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:58 pm
- Location: Stittsville (Ottawa)
- Contact:
Some regions/lakes/rivers don't even allow use of dead bait fish. Yes, frogs, worms, leaches are ok. Crayfish and fish eggs are considered "bait fish" therefore you can't use those where bait fish aren't allowed.Mossman wrote:Slushpuppy...I think you mean live bait *fish*. Frogs, worms, leaches, etc are ok in Quebec I believe.
With the stipulation for frogs that you are in possession of a valid Frog Hunting License of course - lol
I thought you were kidding about the frog hunting licence but it's true, you need a licence to hunt frogs in Quebec, and the frog season is July 15 - Nov 15, who knew!
I may be way off here, I do agree that introducing new species is not a good thing but by using leapard frogs I dont think that is happening, again I dont know if there are different types or whatever of leapard frogs I just know them as the green ones with black spots. I think most of Ontario has them now.....so you wouldnt be introducing them. As for the lack of frogs in some areas they go through cycles some years there are way more than others. I know in my area for a few years you couldnt find them anywhere now you can really notice them coming back. For cray fish.....come on, there are no lack of them.