vexilar vs. humminbird

This is where it's all going on. One can ask for advice or general information or simply chew the fat about fishing tackle, tips, and locations.

Electronics

Poll ended at Mon Jan 23, 2006 5:55 pm

how many of you use a Vexilar?
12
44%
how many of you use LCD type fishfinders?
4
15%
How many of you use no electronic devices?
11
41%
 
Total votes: 27

User avatar
1lastcast
Silver Participant
Silver Participant
Posts: 686
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 1:25 pm
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

vexilar vs. humminbird

Post by 1lastcast »

I have a older humminbird fishfinder that i've placed in a wooden box and coverted the unit to ice fish. The puck like transducer is mounted on a wood pole that i place in the hole.

I can see my lure when i turn up the sensitivity.

Am i wasting my time with this type of setup? Are Vexilars better?
User avatar
bucketmouth
Gold Participant
Gold Participant
Posts: 1685
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 4:26 pm
Location: Russell
Contact:

Post by bucketmouth »

Without a doubt flashers are better than an LCD fishfinder. They're realtime so you see any movement within the cone of your transducer including fish, baitfish, and most importantly your lure.

But an LCD is still better than nothing at all IMO. What model hummingbird are you using?

bucket
User avatar
1lastcast
Silver Participant
Silver Participant
Posts: 686
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 1:25 pm
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Post by 1lastcast »

i have a wide eye. I bought a newer piranhaMax for my boat last spring. So i thought id use the wide eye for winter fishing. I find that the LCD is sometimes hard to see when its real cold out.
User avatar
getnjiggywithit
Bronze Participant
Bronze Participant
Posts: 477
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 1:09 pm
Location: Ottawa/Kingston

Post by getnjiggywithit »

vex in the winter and lcd in the summer!
User avatar
Fishing Freak
Silver Participant
Silver Participant
Posts: 627
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 8:56 am
Location: Brockville

Post by Fishing Freak »

If one can afford it, get a flasher for winter, vex or Marcum, and a good lcd graph for summer.

Now I can't justify spending $400+ on each of 2 different finders.
I will personally be purchasing a x67c, and if I can swing it I'll buy the X68C allseason. These machines are made for both Ice and soft water, the 68 comes with the gps built in.

I do agree the vex and marcum are slightly better for winter fishing though.
User avatar
trapperdirk
Bronze Participant
Bronze Participant
Posts: 144
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 1:30 pm

Post by trapperdirk »

Well I run a Marcum but I can't vote in your poll because then I would be lying . :wink:

TD
User avatar
mosquito
Bronze Participant
Bronze Participant
Posts: 154
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 8:37 pm
Location: Ottawa

Post by mosquito »

When used correctly an LCD in winter is as good as a flasher. Actually
I prefer LCDs.
User avatar
1lastcast
Silver Participant
Silver Participant
Posts: 686
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 1:25 pm
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Post by 1lastcast »

mosquito ~ please explain a little more? What do you mean correctly? Settings?
User avatar
Iceman
Gold Participant
Gold Participant
Posts: 1070
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Location, Location.

Post by Iceman »

Flasher winter, LCD summer.

I have seen many LCD screens freeze up on cold days and they seem to have a time lag.

The flasher is instantaneous.

I agree with trapperdirk MarCum flashers are the way to go. :!:
Last edited by Iceman on Wed Jan 18, 2006 2:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Well and truly hooked!
User avatar
1lastcast
Silver Participant
Silver Participant
Posts: 686
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 1:25 pm
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Post by 1lastcast »

Are MarCum flashers less or more expensive then vexilar?
User avatar
Iceman
Gold Participant
Gold Participant
Posts: 1070
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Location, Location.

Post by Iceman »

Less :D
Well and truly hooked!
User avatar
Born to Pin
Participant
Participant
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 8:39 am

Post by Born to Pin »

Another proud owner of MarCum LX-3 here :twisted: I'll just keep it quite, like Trapper said. One of the best toys I EVER had :shock: :twisted: :D :D
User avatar
trapperdirk
Bronze Participant
Bronze Participant
Posts: 144
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 1:30 pm

Post by trapperdirk »

1lastcast wrote:Are MarCum flashers less or more expensive then vexilar?
Yes Marcums are less money than vexes yet have more features that come standard with them than vexes have . Marcum has raised the bar in the flasher world but no matter what you use they are a great tool . :wink:

TD
User avatar
mosquito
Bronze Participant
Bronze Participant
Posts: 154
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 8:37 pm
Location: Ottawa

Post by mosquito »

1lastcast:
What I mean is a)correct model b)correct setting
Correct model should have as fast scroll as possible and preferably should have a fast track/flasher bar. Many Eage, Lawrance and Garmin models have pretty good response time and have fast track bars. Most older Hammingberds and their newer Pirhanha series are a bit on slower side. They still can be used, but remember the limitations.
Correct settings: 1)deactivate all "extas" such as fish-ID, fish-alarm, automatic depth, temperature/speed reading etc. - they all slow down the response time and don't work correctly in stationary mode anyway.
2) Set the fastest scroll rate. 3) Adjust the sensitivity just to see your lure on required depth. If it is really cold - turn on the light. Many units have them and it helps to keep it just warm enough. I never had
the screen frozen on any of my LCDs even at -28C.
No question that the modern colour flashers are great toys. They just
enormously overpriced, and that's the only problem with them.
User avatar
1lastcast
Silver Participant
Silver Participant
Posts: 686
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 1:25 pm
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Post by 1lastcast »

I agree on the high price of a flasher. Great tips on set up. I will do just that next time out.
Post Reply